New efficiency plots (12/10)

Here are some new plots. Some notes: TW is "Thaler and Wang", cutting on kT mass and min mW mass, then zcell (see last year's report). JH20 and JH50 are the Hopkins tagger using last year's 20% and 50% efficiency points; likewise Pruned20 and Pruned50. Trimmed uses the "optimized" parameters from the grooming section of last year's report. Nsubjettiness cuts on anti-kT mass and tau3/tau2. In all cases the input parameters of the method, if any, are fixed.

  • Efficiencies for all pTs, Herwig events. Even with 60K events, the statistics from TMVA are pretty choppy.herwig.png

  • Same curves, but now apply a five-point moving average to smooth out the noise:
herwig_5pt.png

  • Efficiencies for pT 500-600, Herwig events, five-point moving average. The kinks at the end are artifacts of the average.
  • herwig_500_5pt.png

  • Efficiencies for pT 500-600, Herwig events, incl. detector, five-point moving average:
    herwig_500_det_5pt.png

  • Efficiencies for pT 500-600, Sherpa events, three-point moving average. Sherpa events are matched samples (see write-up in paper).
    sherpa_500_3pt.png

  • Efficiencies for pT 500-600, Sherpa events, incl. detector, three-point moving average:
    sherpa_500_det_3pt.png
Here are some efficiency scans generated with the RunAnalysis.py/Analyses.py code in the SVN. This is all preliminary! Note that all of the plots so far are generated from the ttbar and dijets 500-600 samples from 2010, which are files of 10K events. This leads to statistical issues if you try to optimize to hard, or go to low BG effiencies (1% mis-tag is 200 jets; .1% is just 20).

Plots (updated 20/9)

  • Efficiency curves, for 500-600 pT:
effs_compare_500.png

  • Efficiency curves, for 500-600 pT, with PL's detector sim:
    eff_compare_500_det.png

Older plots

  • This plot compares the HEP top tagger, the Hopkins (JH) tagger, N-subjettiness, and pruning. Only for pruning are the analysis parameters scanned (zcut and Dcut). For JH this did not seem to help (should double check). N-subjettiness has no input parameters, just measurements. I have not implemented access to analysis parameters for the HEP tagger in SpartyJet, and I'm not even sure what should be scanned.
    eff_compare_500.png

    This plot shows the importance of parameter optimization for pruning. "prune_simple" refers to no optimization; "prune" includes a scan of zcut and Dcut. This improves performance by about a factor of two.
    prune_optimization_compare.png

*
I Attachment Action Size Date Who Comment
eff_compare_500.pngpng eff_compare_500.png manage 77 K 20 Sep 2011 - 14:56 ChristopherVermilion Efficiency curves, for 500-600 pT
eff_compare_500_det.pngpng eff_compare_500_det.png manage 62 K 20 Sep 2011 - 14:54 ChristopherVermilion Efficiency curves, for 500-600 pT, with PL's detector sim
eff_detector_compare.pngpng eff_detector_compare.png manage 65 K 29 Aug 2011 - 20:16 ChristopherVermilion Efficiency curves for pruning and N-subjettiness, with and without detector sim
effs_compare_500.pngpng effs_compare_500.png manage 77 K 20 Sep 2011 - 14:58 ChristopherVermilion Efficiency curves, for 500-600 pT (take 2)
herwig.pngpng herwig.png manage 111 K 12 Oct 2011 - 20:27 ChristopherVermilion Efficiencies for all pTs, Herwig events
herwig_500_5pt.pngpng herwig_500_5pt.png manage 86 K 12 Oct 2011 - 20:28 ChristopherVermilion Efficiencies for pT 500-600, Herwig events, five-point moving average
herwig_500_det_5pt.pngpng herwig_500_det_5pt.png manage 101 K 12 Oct 2011 - 20:28 ChristopherVermilion Efficiencies for pT 500-600, Herwig events, incl. detector, five-point moving average
herwig_5pt.pngpng herwig_5pt.png manage 85 K 12 Oct 2011 - 20:27 ChristopherVermilion Efficiencies for all pTs, Herwig events, five-point moving average
prune_optimization_compare.pngpng prune_optimization_compare.png manage 38 K 29 Aug 2011 - 20:16 ChristopherVermilion Efficiency curve for pruning, with and without parameter optimization
sherpa_500_3pt.pngpng sherpa_500_3pt.png manage 106 K 12 Oct 2011 - 20:29 ChristopherVermilion Efficiencies for pT 500-600, Sherpa events, three-point moving average
sherpa_500_det_3pt.pngpng sherpa_500_det_3pt.png manage 93 K 12 Oct 2011 - 20:29 ChristopherVermilion Efficiencies for pT 500-600, Sherpa events, incl. detector, three-point moving average
Topic revision: r3 - 12 Oct 2011, ChristopherVermilion
This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Foswiki? Send feedback