This plot shows the importance of parameter optimization for pruning. "prune_simple" refers to no optimization; "prune" includes a scan of zcut and Dcut. This improves performance by about a factor of two.
I | Attachment | Action | Size | Date | Who | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
png | eff_compare_500.png | manage | 77 K | 20 Sep 2011 - 14:56 | ChristopherVermilion | Efficiency curves, for 500-600 pT |
png | eff_compare_500_det.png | manage | 62 K | 20 Sep 2011 - 14:54 | ChristopherVermilion | Efficiency curves, for 500-600 pT, with PL's detector sim |
png | eff_detector_compare.png | manage | 65 K | 29 Aug 2011 - 20:16 | ChristopherVermilion | Efficiency curves for pruning and N-subjettiness, with and without detector sim |
png | effs_compare_500.png | manage | 77 K | 20 Sep 2011 - 14:58 | ChristopherVermilion | Efficiency curves, for 500-600 pT (take 2) |
png | herwig.png | manage | 111 K | 12 Oct 2011 - 20:27 | ChristopherVermilion | Efficiencies for all pTs, Herwig events |
png | herwig_500_5pt.png | manage | 86 K | 12 Oct 2011 - 20:28 | ChristopherVermilion | Efficiencies for pT 500-600, Herwig events, five-point moving average |
png | herwig_500_det_5pt.png | manage | 101 K | 12 Oct 2011 - 20:28 | ChristopherVermilion | Efficiencies for pT 500-600, Herwig events, incl. detector, five-point moving average |
png | herwig_5pt.png | manage | 85 K | 12 Oct 2011 - 20:27 | ChristopherVermilion | Efficiencies for all pTs, Herwig events, five-point moving average |
png | prune_optimization_compare.png | manage | 38 K | 29 Aug 2011 - 20:16 | ChristopherVermilion | Efficiency curve for pruning, with and without parameter optimization |
png | sherpa_500_3pt.png | manage | 106 K | 12 Oct 2011 - 20:29 | ChristopherVermilion | Efficiencies for pT 500-600, Sherpa events, three-point moving average |
png | sherpa_500_det_3pt.png | manage | 93 K | 12 Oct 2011 - 20:29 | ChristopherVermilion | Efficiencies for pT 500-600, Sherpa events, incl. detector, three-point moving average |